<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GenomeQuest Industry &#187; Gene Patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.genomequest.com/tag/gene-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.genomequest.com</link>
	<description>Conversations on the convergence of SDM, cloud computing, and applications to personalized medicine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gene patents on trial</title>
		<link>http://blog.genomequest.com/2010/02/gene-patents-on-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.genomequest.com/2010/02/gene-patents-on-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informatics Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.genomequest.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GenomeWeb reports on the <a href="http://www.genomeweb.com//node/933032?hq_e=el&#38;hq_m=612278&#38;hq_l=1&#38;hq_v=c092034955">HHS Advisory groups proposal</a> to &#8220;limit the ability of holders of gene patents to keep others from using  those genes for diagnostic and research purposes.&#8221; The <a href="http://www.genomicslawreport.com/">GLR</a> recaps the evolution of the debate and the sponsors an interesting dialog in a recent post <a href="http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/2010/02/02/up-next-in-gene-patents-waiting-for-a-ruling-again-and-sacghs-meets-again/">Up Next in Gene [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GenomeWeb reports on the <a href="http://www.genomeweb.com//node/933032?hq_e=el&amp;hq_m=612278&amp;hq_l=1&amp;hq_v=c092034955">HHS Advisory groups proposal</a> to &#8220;limit the ability of holders of gene patents to keep others from using  those genes for diagnostic and research purposes.&#8221; The <a href="http://www.genomicslawreport.com/">GLR</a> recaps the evolution of the debate and the sponsors an interesting dialog in a recent post <a href="http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/2010/02/02/up-next-in-gene-patents-waiting-for-a-ruling-again-and-sacghs-meets-again/">Up Next in Gene Patents: Waiting for a Ruling (Again) and SACGHS Meets (Again)</a>.</p>
<p>Gene patents were also a hot topic at the <a href="http://www.tri-conference.com/mdx_day2.asp">Molecular Medicine Tri-Conference</a> last week in San Francisco. One of the talks &#8220;Gene Patents in Molecular Diagnostics: Valuable Assets or Impediments?&#8221;. The speaker, Frances <a href="http://www.dfhcc.harvard.edu/membership/profile/member/687/0/">Toneguzzo, Ph.D., Director of Corporate Research and Licensing at MGH</a> brought up an interesting perspective. She discussed the idea that limiting patents on genes is a slippery slope since other forms of biomarker patents, such as &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_imaging">image biomarkers</a>&#8221; could be eliminated from patent protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.genomequest.com/2010/02/gene-patents-on-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

